SEXUAL HARASSMENT AT WORKPLACE - (Blog)
Introduction
Sexual harassment at workplace is a violation of woman’s
right to liberty, life or equality. Because of this reason women don’t feel
secure at a workplace and which results, that women don’t participate in all
the works, the opportunities they could get. It effects their social and
economic empowerment.
On this basis, legislature formulated the sexual harassment of woman at workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and redressal). This kind of legislation was in a great need when a case Vishaka vs state of Rajasthan came forward. There was absence of law at that time, so providing measures to check the evil of sexual harassment of a working woman, Supreme Court, exercised power under article 32 of the constitution, framed guidelines which is to be followed at the workplace, until legislation is enacted for this purpose.
Suppose caste being forward rights under the constitution which are art. 14, 15,19(1)(g) and 21 and provision of convention on elimination of all kind of harassment against women which has been ratified in 1993 by government of India. Guidelines lead by Supreme court were to be treated as law declared under article 141 of the constitution.
Analysis of “POSH ACT’’ and rules
When a case of Vishaka came forward after sixteen years the sexual harassment of women at workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 the act was enacted with the objective to provide protection against sexual harassment of women at workplace, prevention of sexual harassment and for matter connected therewith.
Definition of sexual harassment
The act defines the term sexual harassment as an unwelcome
act or behaviour (whether directly or by implication), physical contact, making
sexually coloured remarks, showing pornography and request for sexual favours.
A physical contact which has no undertaking of a sexual nature and is
occasioned by the gender of complaint may not necessarily amount to sexual
harassment. This act basically envisages the setting up of internal complaints
committee at every office of a workplace or an organization having more than 10
employees to hear and redress the complaints pertaining the sexual harassment. And
where the murder of employees is less
than 10, the act provided for setting up of a local committee in every district
by the district officer, when the committee inquire this kind of complaint it
shall have the same power as held by the civil court. As in the case of Ruchika
Singh Chhabra vs M/s Air France India and Anr. “…. directed that ICC must be
constituted in a strict compliance with the requirements under law.’’ An
aggrieved woman can file a complaint to ICC/LC till 3 months, after the incident
takes place. But when the aggrieved woman is physically incapable, suffering
from a kind of mental disorder the complaint can be made by her legal heirs or
such other person, described in rule 6 of the sexual harassment of the woman at
workplace.
On receiving the complaint, committee before making an
inquiry, may take some steps to settle the matter between her and respondent
through conciliation and when settlement occurs, thereafter no inquiry is made
further.
When both the parties are employers/worker, principle of
natural justice is followed, both the parties are heard and opportunity is
given to make representative against the committee. Within a duration of 90
days the committee complete its inquiry about the whole incident. After completion of inquiry committee has to provide
the report of its findings before district officer or concerned parties.
When allegations are proved against the respondent,
committee has to recommend the employer/district officer to take actions of
sexual harassment as misconduct in accordance with the provision of service
rule have become made, as prescribed in rule 9 of the rules and to pay such sum
to aggrieved woman as it considers appropriate, in accordance with the
provision of section 15, from the salary of respondent. The officer act upon
the recommendation within 60 days. If the complaint filed is false or made due
to malicious intention may recommend to employer.
An appeal can be filled against the recommendation made by
the committee before the court or tribunal, within 90 days from the
recommendation, the accordance with the service rule and absence of service
rules and ser of rules to appellate authority under section 2 of the industrial
employment act, 1946.
There is the prohibition for publishing of the aggrieved woman, or contents of complaint, witnesses, inquiry proceeding or recommendation of the committee, except information regarding the justice secured to any victim of sexual harassment.
Conclusion
Even through the introduction of the act since 2013, the
awareness regarding consequence of sexual harassment and its redressed against
the same is limited. The effective implementation of POSH ACT not only requires
creating an environment where the woman is safe to work, the work somewhere
without any fear, any get justice sensitization of men towards treatment of
women at workplace is equally necessary.
-Akshu
Lloyd Law College
Comments
Post a Comment