“JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED BUT IS JUSTICE HURRIED, JUSTICE BURIED?” - (Blog)


Martin Luther King said, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." But so far as India is concerned, I have been seeing that there is plethora of cases, pending in the Judiciary Machinery of the State. There are many cases which took more than 20 years for rendering justice which is nowhere in consistency with the “Fair Trial” mechanism. Such an inordinate delay in dispensation of justice would bereave its true meaning. We all would have come across Nirbhaya’s case which jarred the consciousness of the entire nation but the Justice for such rarest case was given only after 7 years of difficulty. Though there is a right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the fact that there is no real-time practice. Speedy Trial is a need of an hour, particularly on criminal cases. The delay in justice is an injustice and I suggest that our Indian Judiciary needs to fasten up the proceedings to prevent miscarriage of justice.   

Now, a question comes to our mind,  

Can hurry in justice, a fair justice?

No, I also say that “Justice hurried is Justice buried”. In a murder case of 14 years old boy, where the trial Court has examined 22 out of 24 witnesses in a day and convicted two innocent men, resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. Another paradigm is Andhra Pradesh Disha Act, 2019 which aimed at expediting the verdict in trial in sexual offences against women within 21 days. It is absolutely impossible in practice just because our judicial system ensures ‘even if a thousand culprit escapes, not even one innocent is punished.’ I agree that the speedy trial is mandatory but not at the cost of sacrificing fair justice. So, always justice hurried is justice worried.

Now, another question comes to our mind, then,

How should the judiciary works?

 I believe that Justice delayed is justice denied and justice hurried is justice buried are the metaphors of legal jurisprudence reflect the extreme situations which no ‘Judicial system’ can afford, as both are bound to impede the 'innate Flow' of 'Fountain of Justice'. The balance of Convenience must be maintained between the two. There is an urgent need to cure the deficiencies existing in the present legal system. The foremost issue is that, the lack of judges’ ratio rather than the population ratio. I suggest that our Indian Judicial Service must recruit number of judges to hasten the Justice delivery system and there can be an effectual judicial system only when there is an adequate hearing of every case with consideration of all its circumstances. If it is done, then it would be the great victory for the present justice system.

To put it appropriately, Thomas Jefferson said, “When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.”

 

-M. Lavanya
School of Excellence in Law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MARITAL RAPES IN INDIA: AN UGLY REALITY- (Blog)

CYBER CRIME : A NEW BREED OF CRIMINAL- (Article)

DIGITAL HEALTHCARE IN CORONA TIMES- (Blog)