“JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED BUT IS JUSTICE HURRIED, JUSTICE BURIED?” - (Blog)
Martin
Luther King said, "Injustice
anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." But so far as India is
concerned, I have been seeing that there is plethora of cases, pending in the
Judiciary Machinery of the State. There are many cases which took more than 20
years for rendering justice which is nowhere in consistency with the “Fair Trial” mechanism. Such an
inordinate delay in dispensation of justice would bereave its true meaning. We
all would have come across Nirbhaya’s case which jarred the consciousness of
the entire nation but the Justice for such rarest case was given only after 7
years of difficulty. Though there is a right to speedy trial under Article 21
of the Constitution of India, the fact that there is no real-time practice. Speedy
Trial is a need of an hour, particularly on criminal cases. The delay in
justice is an injustice and I suggest that our Indian Judiciary needs to fasten
up the proceedings to prevent miscarriage of justice.
Now,
a question comes to our mind,
Can hurry in justice, a
fair justice?
No, I also say that “Justice hurried is Justice buried”. In a murder case of 14 years
old boy, where the trial Court has examined 22 out of 24 witnesses in a day and
convicted two innocent men, resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. Another paradigm
is Andhra Pradesh Disha Act, 2019 which aimed at expediting the verdict in
trial in sexual offences against women within 21 days. It is absolutely
impossible in practice just because our judicial system ensures ‘even if a thousand culprit escapes, not
even one innocent is punished.’ I agree that the speedy trial is mandatory
but not at the cost of sacrificing fair justice. So, always justice hurried is
justice worried.
Now,
another question comes to our mind, then,
How should the
judiciary works?
I believe that Justice delayed is justice
denied and justice hurried is justice buried are the metaphors of legal
jurisprudence reflect the extreme situations which no ‘Judicial system’ can
afford, as both are bound to impede the 'innate
Flow' of 'Fountain of Justice'. The balance of Convenience must be
maintained between the two. There is an urgent need to cure the deficiencies
existing in the present legal system. The foremost issue is that, the lack of
judges’ ratio rather than the population ratio. I suggest that our Indian
Judicial Service must recruit number of judges to hasten the Justice delivery
system and there can be an effectual judicial system only when there is an adequate
hearing of every case with consideration of all its circumstances. If it is
done, then it would be the great victory for the present justice system.
To
put it appropriately, “When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.”
Justice hurried is justice burried. Good work.
ReplyDelete