ANIMAL CRUELTY IN INDIA: A LEGAL DISASTER?- (Blog)
PRELUDE:
“The greatest privilege that comes with freedom of
speech is using your voice for those who don’t have one” – Ricky
Gervais
To
begin with, would you believe me if I told you… the cruelest animal in the world
is a Human? Why because? A Pregnant elephant from Kerala, a pregnant cow from
Himachal Pradesh and a jackal from Tamil Nadu were killed by feeding
explosives-stuffed food. It is disheartening to see how those heartless humans
have failed to realize that even a voiceless creature has a right to live. These
incidents of Animal cruelty wept my soul and led to think “How humans losing
humanity”. What’s being done to stop it? Does the existing legislations are
sufficient enough to deter and prevent rampant occurrences in the future? For
the answers to these questions, it is important to evaluate where exactly India
stands as far as Animal Cruelty Prevention is concerned.
SCANTY LAWS: A PLIGHT OF THE ANIMALS
Are
we living in the world of development? Nope. I think we are living in the 60’s
era. Why because? Our Country’s most prominent legislation for Animal Cruelty
was enacted in 1960. Since then, no amendments were made. Under Section 11 of Prevention
of cruelty to animals, 1960, makes the offender liable to pay a fine that may
extend to only fifty rupees. It still stands to date. Such a penalty was
probably adequate during that period but do you think such a miniscule penalty
really matters in this present era? I would say ‘NO’. There are several laws
under the Constitution of India (1950), Indian Penal Code (1860), and Wildlife Protection
Act (1972) to mention few for the safety, protection and punishment in cases of
cruelty. There are also some bills were drafted calling for higher penalties
and broadening the scope of offences to revamp the 1960’s Act. But, to be
honest, these laws and the bills are not sufficient enough to deal with this
present inhumane world. The lack of these effective laws and unawareness of
such laws among the public indirectly encourages the occurrence of such
dreadful incidences.
PUBLIC OUTRAGE FOR CREUTLY AGAINST
HUMANS; WHY NOT FOR ANIMALS?
Do
you think that the human beings are only esteemed living creature on earth? Nope,
Indeed, Animals are the most esteemed living creature than human beings. For
instance, A woman and a dog were viciously
raped by the so-called human beings. There was a huge cry among the public to
render justice for the women. But they disdained the dog. Don’t you think that even an animal suffers
pain? In fact, animals too have same emotions just like humans. Then why,
justice is not being served to the voiceless? I wish at least in the future,
priority has to be given for both living creatures and must voice out as they
do for their fellow beings.
JUDICIAL APPROACH:
I
can see a ray of hope from the judiciary side as it so far delivered judgments
in support of animal personhood. In a case where the court stated that the
entire animal kingdom including avian and aquatic are declared as legal
entities having a distinct persona with corresponding rights, duties and
liabilities of a living person[i].
The court also has included the non-humans under the ambit of the doctrine of
‘parens patrie’[ii].
It has also raised the issue of the lack of role by the legislature and
executive in the enactment and implementation of laws respectively.
CONCLUSION:
Although,
NGO’s and Animal Right Activists do raises their voices for these brazen killings
but their voices are too weak to be heard. Society must aware of the plight
that animals face and must raise consciousness about it. There is also an
urgent need for the stringent laws and effective implementation of those laws.
I personally wish that the legislature should enact laws on the same pedestal how they enact for the cruelty against humans. Because, day by day, I can see “Humanity in animals and cruelty in humans”
[i] Karnail
Singh and others Vs State of Haryana
[ii] Narayan
Dutt Bhatt vs Union of India & Ors, 2018 SCC Online Utt 645
Comments
Post a Comment