BANNING OF CHINESE APPS IN INDIA- (Blog)

Where the whole world is fighting against the deadly coronavirus, India is also fighting a battle with its neighbouring country China. Where there is high tension on the indo-china border and the dispute regarding the stretch of land along the Sino-India border continues, the digital connections with China are now being withdrawn by India.

On 29^th June, 2020, India banned 59 Chinese apps including social media platforms such as tik-tok, helo, WeChat and other apps as well such as UC browser, shareit, shein, etc. According to the Indian government such measures has been taken to protect the interest of the nation and for its security. The government through its press release by the ministry of electronics and information technology stated that’s these apps were a threat to the sovereignty and integrity of the nation and these apps were being used by the neighbouring country to transfer the data from the Indian users to other countries unauthorizedly. Even after banning of these 49 apps, 47 more apps were operating as colons of the previously banned apps. A list of 275 apps has been prepared lately by the government. The government will conduct scrutiny of these applications to ensure that they are not in violation of the security and integrity of the country. The list includes popular gaming app PUBG, economic giant ALIBABA, XIAOMI, and other Chinese apps.

 

LAW APPLICABLE

The Indian government’s decision of banning these Chinese apps has been exercised under section 69A of the information technology act, 2000 that reads with certain provisions of Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by the citizens) Rules, 2009. The sections give power to the government to ban any website or application that imposes some kind of threat to the countries defence, sovereignty, integrity, or law and order of the country. This section can also be used in case of an “emergency” where an interim measure issuing the ban of the website can be directed. 

Since the information on the banning of 59 Chinese app was disclosed by the government through a press release and no detailed information was given for the same so the act of banning these apps is void ab- intio, as it does not, fulfill the requirement of section 69A of IT act.

In Shreya Singhal v/s Union of India [1], the Supreme Court held that section 69A was constitutional and a ban on applications can be imposed through a detailed and reasoned order. The court also said that the ban can be issued only on the committee’s approval and after the hearing of the aggrieved party and the reason for such blocking has to be clearly stated in writing even in case of emergency.

 There are certain rules that have been led down in Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by the citizens) Rules, 2009 also known as the blocking rules that are to be followed by the government before passing the blocking orders. However, these sets of rules were not completed by the government while banning 59 Chinese apps in India and the action of the government was not in conformity with the rule of law.

 

CONCLUSION 

Though the actions of the government aimed at protecting the security of the nation but these actions did not satisfy the legal provisions of section 64A of IT act. Proper blocking procedure was not followed by the government. The government is bound to provide proper reasoning of its orders to block such applications to protect the right to information of the citizens. If the government takes such actions in the future then it must ensure that a proper procedure is followed while doing so that its decisions can sustain all legal challenges imposed on it.

  

[1] Singhal v. Union of India, (2013) 12 S.C.C. 73

-Akanksha Mishra

Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies.