LEGAL REALITY OF EUTHANASIA IN INDIA- (Blog)
When a person takes birth, he is desirous to live
and enjoy the fruits of life to the fullest till he dies. But due to various circumstances,
his life comes to an end by unnatural means. If a person ends his life by himself,
this act is called ‘suicide’, if a person ends the life of another it’s called
‘homicide’, but to end life of a person by others with the request of the
deceased is called ‘euthanasia’ or ‘mercy killing’. Though suicide and
euthanasia seems to be similar, the objectives behind them are contrasting.
Euthanasia is mainly associated with terminal
illness or who have become incapacitated and don’t want to go through the pains
and sufferings throughout the life. This is one of the controversial issues
which have deep impact on morals, values and beliefs of the society. Recently
the Supreme Court has legalised ‘passive
euthanasia’ in India with the Judgement of Aruna Shanbaug.
Passive
Euthanasia:
Euthanasia is passive when the treatment that is
sustaining life of the patient is held off, resulting in death of the patient. In
passive euthanasia, usually the life supporting devices are removed to cause
death to a person who is virtually dead and doctors do not actively kill the
patients but they stop the attempts to save them.
Legal
Aspects in India:
In India, euthanasia is undoubtedly illegal. It is
because, in case of euthanasia there is an intention on the part of doctor to
kill the patient and such an act falls U/S. 300(1) of IPC. Provision for
punishing ‘attempt to commit suicide’ is contained in Section 309 and this is
under the scanner for its constitutionality but is not scrapped by the Court
yet. “Right to suicide” is not an available right. Though the Indian
Constitution grants “right to life” as a Fundamental Right Under Article 21, it
does not include “right to die” as decided in the case of Gian Kaur vs. State of Punjab[1].
Landmark
Judgement on euthanasia in India:
The Judgement of the Supreme Court in Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. UOI[2]
has opened the gateway for the ‘legalization of passive euthanasia in India’.
In this case, a petition was filed for seeking allowance for euthanasia for
Aruna who was in vegetative state. The Court dismissed the petition and
observed that “passive euthanasia is permissible under supervision of law in
exceptional cases”, but did not permit euthanasia. Hence, with this the Court
has recognised “right to die with dignity” as a Fundamental Right U/A 21which
will help to alleviate the hardships of the person suffering with incurable
diseases.
Conclusion:
There are arguments in favour of and against the
legalization of passive euthanasia, but when the moral objective behind this is
considered, I go with the words of Friedrich Nietzsche “one should die proudly, when it’s no longer possible to live proudly” and
hence, the decision of the SC in this regard is commendable.
Comments
Post a Comment