INDIA IS A SECULAR STATE! - (Blog)
“What’s
good for the goose is good for the gander.” In the Context of Secularism, what
is good for Muslim, Christian, and Sikh is good for the Hindu.
What
is meant by Secularism?
Secularism
means independent of religion. In other words we can also say that anyone can
choose to practice or not to practice any religion they want, in this
Government cannot force them to do so and have no right to impose one
particular religion. The main feature of Secular state or Secularism is that it
looks on all religion on equal footing, there is freedom of workshop and
accepts freedom of religion that encourages rational thinking with all citizens
with equal rights. The term “Secularism” is coined by British reformer ‘George
Jacob Holyoake’ and it is invented to describe his view of promoting a social order separate from
religion without actively dismissing or criticizing religious belief and the
opposite of this term is ‘Theocracy’ which means Priest of one religion are the
ruler or king of that particular country. The western concept of Secularism
means separation of religious institutions from the institutions of the state
and freedom of conscience for all individuals, circumscribed only by the
respect of the rights of other individuals with no discrimination by the state
against individual on the basis of their benefits.
Ideological Contest in
India: In this there are two proper sets i.e.
1. Multiculturalists view of Gandhi, Nehru and Tagore 2. Particularistic view
of Hindu right-wing to state the relation between state and religion
1. Multiculturalist’s
view of Gandhi, Nehru and Tagore:
In this Gandhi gave the concept “Sarva Dharma Sama Bhava” in which equality of
religion is the prime objective. His belief was based on two things i.e. India
is a deeply religious society as religion play a role in public life, person
religion is also important what he/ she choose. While Nehru in this context had
different opinion as Dharma Nirpeksha, religion should become a private matter
and should not play a role in guiding public life.
2. Particularistic
view of Hindu right-wing: There is a
difference between Indian and Western society i.e. latter is capable of
individuation. India should be found on a vivid sense of common identity and
this common identity can only come from religion.
Constitution
provisions:
By the 42nd amendment, 1976 the word “secular” was inserted in the
preamble of the Constitution of India. It hereby means that equal treatment of
all religion by the state and do not recognize any religion as a State Religion
as it provide religious freedom.
Indian constitution is Supreme Lex it means
supreme law of the land, this document is created by the constituent assembly
of India because each and every word of constitution is debated and inserted in
Indian constitution. The constituent assembly of India inserted freedom of
religion to all but stated that such freedom is not absolute as it is bound
under reasonable restrictions. Article 25 to 28 of the Constitution gives guarantee
to every person through freedom of conscience and the right to profess,
practice and propagate religion. Now it is a fundamental right guaranteed to
all the Citizens in most of the democratic countries throughout the world and
these countries include India as it is mentioned in preamble also. If there is a violation of fundamental Rights
of citizens then they can knock the doors of Supreme Court and High courts
under Article 32 and 226 respectively.
Case
Law:
Supreme Court reiterated an earlier ruling in the case of S.R.
Bommai v. Union of India, 1993, that Secularism is a
part of basic structure of the constitution and therefore cannot be amended.
Secularism is derived from the cultural principle of tolerance and ensures
equality to all religions which depicts a true picture of preamble. The court
reduplicates Nehru’s opinion that no religion will be at risk in a secular
India, because the government will not be confined to religion.
How
secularism played out in India Democracy in the field of personal laws?
Article 25 gives government to intervene equally in all religions in pursuits of social reform. But Govt. intervention proved to be selective, as Hindu laws were reformed but not Muslim laws. If secularism is equality of all religions then minority rights and retention of personal law is a violation.
Conclusion:
Secularism per se has little to do with
inequality or injustice within religious group. Secularism has been presented
as the opposite of communalism and theocratic states. The challenge to
secularism has come from personal faith or religion and belief, but from
religious group that struggle for power and domination and that protection
towards our economy has also arised.
Thankyou so much for publication🌸😇
ReplyDelete